STUDENTS FIRST! PROCESS REDESIGN
CHANGE PROPOSAL AND ACTION PLAN
Return to Change Proposal List
SERVICE: Information Dissemination - Student Database Linking
Current Situation:
The mainframe student database includes basic demographic, financial and transcript
information for both credit and non-credit students. It is used for multiple functions including
conducting transactions, obtaining student information, and advising a student. Limited
capabilities of existing databases do not allow all transactions to be entered directly into the
system resulting in the creation of additional databases as well as alternative methods of
recordkeeping. In addition, several departments are unable to input information necessary for
mandated Federal and State reporting. Insufficient disc space led to the purging of thousands of
credit and non-credit student records from the database that are now stored by microfiche and
microfilm. Since 1992, the purging of participating credit students has ceased.
The ability to conduct student related transactions on the database is limited.
Employees at the outreach centers do not have the authority to accept payment on-line for
students or make financial adjustments. Payments made by credit card can not be processed
on-site. The payment processing and information entry is postponed at least a day so that it can
be processed on the main campus. Student payment resolution is delayed and funds are
handled multiple times to process a single transaction.
Employees depend on the information provided on the database to provide services to
students. In order to provide their students answers to basic questions, the Florence Outreach
Center estimates making thirty telephone calls a day to the main campus. In the OSRL survey,
thirty-six percent of respondents take non-credit courses and approximately two and one-half
percent are taking both credit and non-credit courses. However, employees on the main
campus are unable to access course information for students taking non-credit courses.
According to input gathered in individual interviews with employees representing Adult
Basic and Secondary Education, Continuing Education, Business Development Center, Business
and Industry Services, and Training and Development, six duplicate databases were identified in
addition to the main student database. In the ABSE department, employees may enter identical
data up to three times. During input sessions, employees commented that student information
changes can go undetected because no connection exists between duplicate databases.
Students in ABSE, LEAP and GED programs are unable to access their unofficial transcripts or
schedules from ATLAS.
Students have multiple records with inconsistent information and all available student
information has been hard to locate. The Student Records Office from July 1995 -1996 merged
approximately four hundred multiple student records. There is limited capability to cross-check
student information between the database and other record keeping systems. Lane discovers
student record errors by relying on undelivered mail and by the student or employees stumbling
across the errors in the records.
Outreach Centers as well as main-campus departments keep paper files of student
records. Some paper record keeping is federally or state mandated. The Florence campus
keeps paper files to ensure student financial transactions conducted on-site are reflected later by
the main-campus.
Desired Situation:
All student record information will be linked. Employees at various locations will be
empowered to conduct transactions and increase overall service to students. Employees can
access complete information on a student without taking many unnecessary steps to find needed
information.
Independent alternative data bases created to meet needs unmet by the current
databases will not exist. All data will be entered only once.
Proposed Solution:
The Information Planning Team will coordinate, advise, and consult a group of
programmers who will dedicate a portion of their time to linking databases. The team will identify
additional members for this project including: one redesign team member, one computer
services programmer, three multiple database users from different departments. They will work
with the programmers beginning with the initial design through the testing and debugging of the
system up to its implementation.
Input from the Linn-Benton Community College outreach center employees shared
increased satisfaction with the ability to access all student information as well as processing
transactions for students. Additional employees, in particular, the Students First! Center Team
will be trained to conduct various transactions currently limited to specific departments.
Employees college-wide will have additional abilities to a majority of student related information.
Departments using alternative methods of student information record keeping, and
computer services will be involved in creating a system that meets the various record keeping
needs.
All databases will be linked to the main database in a user-friendly system that can be
accessed college-wide. Employees will be able to access student information and students in
departments not currently linked to the database will also have better access through alternative
means to get their records.
Coach (from Redesign Team): Ray Smith
Sponsor: Marie Matsen
Due Date: August 1997
Measurement |
Tools for Measuring |
Responsibility for Tracking Measurement |
decrease employee time spent re-entering and accessing student data |
baseline = must be established
follow-up = employee tracking system must be established |
Information Dissemination Process Owner Manager |
Action Plan For Implementing Solution:
Task |
By Whom |
By When |
Resources Required |
Identify additional members to the Information Planning Team to be involved with database
linking project. |
Information Planning Team |
December 96 |
Hire and train programmers. |
Information Planning Team+ |
March - June 97 |
320 hrs. per contracted programmer |
Create and design system (i.e., how the linking will be done, investigate needed fields,
create user friendly fields). |
Planning Team, programmers |
June - October 97 |
800 hrs. per contracted programmer |
Test the linked database system. |
Planning Team, programmers |
October - November 97 |
40 hrs. per contracted programmer |
Debug the system. |
Planning Team, programmers |
December 97 - January 98 |
80 hrs. per contracted programmer |
Implement the system. |
Planning Team, programmers |
February 98 |
40 hrs. per contracted programmer |
Continue to Part Seven of the Redesign Change Proposals
Return to Part Five of the Redesign Change Proposals
|