This is a historical/archived web page. For current budget information go to: 2011sitearchive.lanecc.edu/budget
TRANSPARENCY GROUP
MEETING NOTES
FEBRUARY 1, 2002
Assignments:
o The TG will bring their own questions regarding Kaarenís ìShort-Term
Productî to the group on 2/6.
o Dennis will bring his draft paper on ìWhat is transparency?î
o Give feedback to Kay Malmberg regarding the budget terminology definitions.
o E-mail Annie for agenda items.
o E-mail material ìownerî regarding questions on their material.
o Marie will bring an example of a monthly cash flow report.
Future Meetings
Determine if the group needs to meet each Thursday and Friday of each
week. TG will meet this coming Thursday (2/7) and determine if a
Friday meeting would be needed.
Review the charter
Annie reminded the group that the TG was formed to review budget documents
and the processes in ìthis budget processî and make recommendations to
the Executive Team about how to make the budget documents and processes
clearer and more understandable. It does not say to make ìchangesî
to the process. The group will need to look at what is needed by
2/22 to fulfill this charter and how to communicate to their constituencies
beforehand. The TG can consider later how to move forward with
long term changes.
Short Term Product
Kaaren prepared a draft format for a short-term product proposal (attached)
. A summary of items that may be included in the proposal were:
-
Provide an in depth description of ìtransparencyî
-
Recommend to break out the Restricted from the Unrestricted in the General
Fund in order to track revenue from itís source and to where it was expended.
-
Recommend bringing the Restricted fund balance forward as a source of revenues
against current restricted expenditures. The unexpended balance in the
restricted fund budget should be the carryover into the next fiscal year.
-
Recommend that ET set clear criteria for departmental ICP. Departments
would have to state why fee has been set; how it is being expended; plans
and justification for carryover; emphasize departmental accountability.
-
Recommend departments have a five year plan for major carryovers
of restricted funds. The plan would be approved by the Board.
-
Recommend limiting carryover in ICP & M&S funds to the amount budgeted
for planned acquisitions and a percentage of carryover for unplanned expenditures.
The balance of funds would then revert to general college use.
-
Describe training possibilities
Handouts:
-
2002-03 Budget Calendar - Kay Malmberg
-
Budget Terms Glossary ñ Kay Malmberg
-
Transparency Goals ñ Dennis Gilbert
-
Short Term Product Proposal ñ Kaaren OíRourke
-
History of Networking Capital ñ Marie Matsen
-
Analysis of Ending Fund Balance ñ Marie Matsen
-
Revenue Summary (Actual Amounts Matching Audit Reports) - Marie Matsen
-
ìOtherî Revenue Details ñ Marie Matsen
-
Adjustments to Budget Simulation ñ FY02 ñ Marie Matsen
-
Budget Policy Issues ñ Marie Matsen
-
ORS Regarding Unappropriated Ending Fund Balance and Reservesñ Marie Matsen
-
LCCEA Google search for ìtransparent budget and ìcollegeî ñ Marie Matsen
-
Oregon Community Colleges FY 00 General Fund ñ Marie Matsen
-
Maricopa CC ñ Financial Advisory Council- Marie Matsen
-
What are Budgets? ñ Marie Matsen
-
Excerpt ñ Financial Responsibilities of Boards ñ Marie Matsen
Communications to Constituencies
TG discussed how they would apprise their constituents of the
groupís work and proposal to the Executive Team. An example might
be:
The TG has reached agreement with ____________.
There are still questions regarding
____________.
We would like to have your comments by
________.
Next meeting will be Thursday, Feb. 7. , 3-5PM, SCI 186.
AGENDA: to draft a product that will go to the constituency.
Send feedback to the Budget Advisory Group at baginput@lanecc.edu
Return to Lane's Home Page
| Budget Development
Main Page
Please direct comments about this page to: Terry
Caron
URL http://2011sitearchive.lanecc.edu/budget/020102.htm
Revised 2/20/02 (llb)
© Lane Community College